December 2006 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Fri Dec 1 14:33:48 EDT 2006
Ending: Sat Dec 30 15:17:53 EDT 2006
Messages: 39

• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version numbers are broken in 5.91   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments   Peter Gavin
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Hashes in the number syntax   Neil Jerram
• [r6rs-discuss] Hashes in the number syntax   Paul Schlie
• [r6rs-discuss] formal responses   dyb at cs.indiana.edu
• [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments   Paul Schlie
• [r6rs-discuss] Formal comment 61   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 produces   Felix Klock
• [r6rs-discuss] Comment 92: Phase semantics   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Comment 92: Phase semantics   dyb at cs.indiana.edu
• [r6rs-discuss] Comment 111: Syntax-rules   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Re: Comment 111: Syntax-rules   dyb at cs.indiana.edu
    • [r6rs-discuss] Re: Comment 111: Syntax-rules   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: Comment 111: Syntax-rules   dyb at cs.indiana.edu
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 produces   Paul Schlie
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 produces   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 (corrected)   Paul Schlie
• [r6rs-discuss] response to formal comment 8 [equality predicates and NaN]   Per Bothner

Last message date: Sat Dec 30 15:17:53 EDT 2006
Archived on: Sat Dec 30 15:16:54 EDT 2006

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...