[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (no subject)

[Stanislav Ievlev]

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:12:01PM +0300, Stanislav Ievlev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 01:07:55PM -0500, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> > ---
> > This message is a formal comment which was submitted to 
> > formal-comment at r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: 
> > http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
> > ---
> > Name        : Andre van Tonder
> > Email       : andre at het.brown.edu
> > Type        : simplification
> > Priority    : minor
> > Component   : enumerations
> > Version     : 5.91
> > Pages       : 118-120
> > Dependencies: None
> > 
> > Summary:
> > --------
> > 
> > No rationale is given for having the library (r6rs enum) in the report.  
> > Unless there is a compelling rationale, it is suggested that the library be 
> > dropped.
> agreed.
We already have symbols for enumeration values.