[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop enumerations library?
andre at het.brown.edu
Thu Nov 2 10:57:12 EST 2006
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> There is no abstraction to break and no forging going on in the previous
> example. The symbol little is the symbol little, regardless of how you got
I agree completely. While the syntax "(endianness ---)" might give
the appearance of providing an abstraction, this is a false illusion. Given
this, I don't see why it is occupying useful namespace.
More information about the r6rs-discuss