[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall should be for-all for consistency with for-each

[Arthur A.Gleckler]

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment at r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Name: Arthur A. Gleckler
Email: r6rs at speechcode.com
Type: defect
Priority: minor
Component: Libraries (List utilities)
Version: 5.91

In <12. List utilities>, please change the name of forall to for- 
all.  This is consistent with for-each, and "forall" is not an  
English word in any case.