[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall should be for-all for consistency
trentbuck at gmail.com
Tue Nov 14 13:30:56 EST 2006
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 12:38:03PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:
> > In <12. List utilities>, please change the name of forall to for-
> > all. This is consistent with for-each, and "forall" is not an
> > English word in any case.
> +1 (or better yet go with the SRFI-1 versions instead).
Trent Buck, Student Errant
More information about the r6rs-discuss