[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytes<->vector procedures

[Abdulaziz Ghuloum]

On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> Since these can be implemented extremely efficiently, it seems a pity 
> not
> to provide them.

Sorry, I don't get it.  What does efficiency of implementation have 
anything to do with inclusion in R6RS?  I can implement these in many 
implementations efficiently already.

Aziz,,,