[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytes<->vector procedures
aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu
Tue Nov 14 19:12:38 EST 2006
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:31 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> Since these can be implemented extremely efficiently, it seems a pity
> to provide them.
Sorry, I don't get it. What does efficiency of implementation have
anything to do with inclusion in R6RS? I can implement these in many
implementations efficiently already.
More information about the r6rs-discuss