[r6rs-discuss] line separators

[John Cowan]

Chris Hanson scripsit:
> Is there a reason that line separators (U+2028) are treated
> differently from other eol styles?  It seems to me that line
> separators should be translated to #\newline internally, just like any
> other eol style?

+1, and the same for U+85, which is the Unicode equivalent of
EBCDIC NEL.

-- 
Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield],        John Cowan
one who looks with unconcern on a man           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
struggling for life in the water, and when      cowan at ccil.org
he has reached ground encumbers him with help?
        --Samuel Johnson