[r6rs-discuss] line separators
cowan at ccil.org
Mon Nov 20 19:29:34 EST 2006
Chris Hanson scripsit:
> Is there a reason that line separators (U+2028) are treated
> differently from other eol styles? It seems to me that line
> separators should be translated to #\newline internally, just like any
> other eol style?
+1, and the same for U+85, which is the Unicode equivalent of
Is not a patron, my Lord [Chesterfield], John Cowan
one who looks with unconcern on a man http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
struggling for life in the water, and when cowan at ccil.org
he has reached ground encumbers him with help?
More information about the r6rs-discuss