[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove double phase semantics
AndrevanTonder
andre at het.brown.edu
Sun Nov 26 22:18:01 EST 2006
Given the controversial nature of the issue, it seems clear to me that the
current compromise language of the draft is the best one can hope for under the
circumstances.
For this reason, consider the formal comment withdrawn.
As for my reference implementation, since I have implemented both shared and
separate-binding semantics, I will provide a configuration switch whereby
either semantics can be toggled, starting with its next release.
Andre
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list