[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Add (sort) and (vector-sort!) procedures
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak at knm.org.pl
Mon Oct 2 15:34:25 EDT 2006
"Jason Orendorff" <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> writes:
> For the sake of putting forth a realistic proposal, I suggest adopting
> (only) the non-stable functional list-sort and the non-stable
> four-parameter in-place vector-sort! from SRFI-32.
If any sorting is adopted, I call for making Schwartzian transform
available. People must not be advised to pass
(lambda (x y) (< (car x) (car y)))
as the comparison. They should pass
as two separate arguments (or just car with < being the default).
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak at knm.org.pl
More information about the r6rs-discuss