[r6rs-discuss] The definition of flonum is in the wrong place
pgavin at gmail.com
Sun Oct 15 20:02:59 EDT 2006
On 10/8/06, Aubrey Jaffer <agj at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> | It is a very useful clarification, especially given that there will
> | probably be many systems in which the flonums will not be a proper
> | subset of the inexact reals.
> Then the sentence should read:
> The flonums are a subset of the inexact reals, but may include all
> of the inexact reals.
I think this is clearer. However, something along the lines of:
Some inexact reals may not be flonums.
is even better.
More information about the r6rs-discuss