[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] only 'big' and 'little' as endiannness may not be enough

[Anton van Straaten]

Admin note: the message referred to below was resubmitted as a formal 
comment and has now been processed as such.


Shiro Kawai wrote:
> Submitter: Shiro Kawai
> Email address: shiro at acm.org
> Issue type: Enhancement
> Priority: Minor
> Component: Libraries
> Report version: 5.91
> Summary: only 'big' and 'little' as endiannness may not be enough