[r6rs-discuss] R6RS size...

[Michael Sperber]

John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Michael Sperber scripsit:
>
>> I agree that the report draft currently itself isn't as good as it
>> could be making that distinction clear and easy to understand.  I'll
>> personally try my best to improve that situation.  Concrete
>> suggestions on how to do this would be quite welcome.
>
> The obvious approach is to divide it entirely into two documents,
> "R6RS" and "R6RS Standard Libraries", as Sun did for Java.
> I think that would go a very long way toward reducing complaints.

I would personally very much like that, but haven't worked out all the
implications of doing that.  There are a few forward references in the
document that prevent this currently, but all the ones I know of could
easily be fixed.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla