[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"

[Robby Findler]

At Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:01:02 -0400, Anton van Straaten wrote:
> However, allegations that these usages are *wrong* in some sense seem to 
> result from a misunderstanding of the sense in which the terms are being 
> used.

I don't think that anyone doubts there is a way to use the language
consistently, but perhaps if a different word were chosen (the "boring"
value or the "uninteresting" value or the "unit" value (following ML)
or ...) it would be clearer to casual readers what was going on.

Just my $0.02,
Robby