[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified" (naming)

[Jeff Read]

Jonathan,

On 9/22/06, Jonathan A Rees <jar at mumble.net> wrote:

>
> But I still think specifying a value at all is contrary to what used
> to be the language's goals. As this issue is separate from the naming
> issue I'll explain separately (maybe in a couple of days).
>

Hmmm... We have a type, with a value, to indicate the absence of a value.

A bit strange, that, now that I think on it some. :)

Looking forward to your elucidation of the issue.

--Jeff