[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] letrec* vs. letrec

[John Cowan]

Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan at ccil.org
Issue type: Defect
Priority: Major
Component: Base Library
Report version: 5.91
Summary:  letrec* and letrec explained identically in 9.5.6

In 9.5.6 (p. 32), the text reads "in a letrec* and in a letrec expression",
suggesting that something was to be supplied for letrec* but was not.
I suggest something like "all bindings are in effect, but evaluations
are performed sequentially" for letrec*.

-- 
John Cowan  http://ccil.org/~cowan  cowan at ccil.org
All "isms" should be "wasms".   --Abbie