[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] letrec* vs. letrec
cowan at ccil.org
Fri Sep 22 15:56:28 EDT 2006
Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan at ccil.org
Issue type: Defect
Component: Base Library
Report version: 5.91
Summary: letrec* and letrec explained identically in 9.5.6
In 9.5.6 (p. 32), the text reads "in a letrec* and in a letrec expression",
suggesting that something was to be supplied for letrec* but was not.
I suggest something like "all bindings are in effect, but evaluations
are performed sequentially" for letrec*.
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
More information about the r6rs-discuss