[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Extended definition of map and for-each
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Fri Sep 22 16:43:15 EDT 2006
Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan at ccil.org
Issue type: Enhancement
Priority: Minor
Component: Base Library
Report version: 5.91
Summary: Map and for-each should work even if lists are of unequal length
The R6RS definitions of "map" and "for-each" should permit the list
arguments to be of unequal length, and specify that they terminate
when the shortest list runs out. This is what SRFI-1 does, it is
cheap, and it is useful.
--
One Word to write them all, John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
One Access to find them, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
One Excel to count them all,
And thus to Windows bind them. --Mike Champion
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list