[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Equivalence predicate version of memp

AndrevanTonder andre at het.brown.edu
Wed Sep 27 16:55:52 EDT 2006


On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, William D Clinger wrote:

> Andre van Tonder wrote:
>> Memp is unwieldy and potentially inefficient in the very common
>> case where one tests for membership is based on an equivalence predicate....
>
> ...
>
> Judging by those numbers, I don't think efficiency
> is a major issue here.

Thank you - this satisfactorily addresses what most bothered me.

Andre



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list