[r6rs-discuss] Incorrect sample code for vector-sort!

[Michael Sperber]

"Llewellyn Pritchard" <leppie at wdsl.co.za> writes:

> (define v (vector 3 5 2 1))
> (vector-sort! v)     =) unspecified
> v                           =) #(1 2 3 5)
>
> According to the definition, vector-sort! should take a procedure as the 
> first argument.
> Is the proc argument perhaps optional?

No, this is a typo.  (Will go on the errata list.)  Thanks for catching
it!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla