[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library

[R. Kent Dybvig]

> Sure.  All I'm arguing for is not making the wrong decision.  The
> interaction that SRFI 39 entails happens to be particularly hideous,
> and unnecessary at that.

Actually, Chez Scheme's threads and parameters get along perfectly well. 
We have both global and thread parameters, and most parameters end up
being thread parameters.  So I respectfully disagree that the interaction
is hideous---or even bad.

Kent