[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Inappropriate number of values should be defined

[John Cowan]

Michael Sperber scripsit:

> It's in Section 9.17:
> 
> >> The continuations of all non-final expressions within a sequence of
> >> expressions in lambda, begin, let, let*, letrec, letrec*,
> >> let-values, let*-values, case, cond, and do forms as well as the
> >> continuations of the before and after arguments to dynamic-wind take
> >> an arbitrary number of values.

Excellent.  I suggest that a cross-reference be added to "values", then,
because the language there is unequivocal and wrong.

-- 
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML      John Cowan
Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker       cowan at ccil.org
saying "No information items inside".           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Eve Maler