[r6rs-discuss] parent-rtd clauses in records
andre at het.brown.edu
Tue Jul 3 13:21:59 EDT 2007
I see a PARENT-RTD clause has been added to the records syntactic
layer. While I may have caused this indirectly by complaining about
the previous version, I think the interface was teetering on the
brink of collapsing under the weight of its own complexity
(two and a half dense html pages are currently dedicated to
describing record constructors), and I'm afraid this might
just take it over the edge.
Also, is adding new stuff in the ratification version a good idea?
Presumably the only way to register disagreement with additions
in this version is to vote no to ratification, isn't it?
More information about the r6rs-discuss