[r6rs-discuss] an essay on language design

[R. Kent Dybvig]

> Lack of insight would have been tolerable.  Pretended
> insight, which is the only possible source of the two
> paragraphs of tendentious nonsense that were added in
> the 5.97 draft, is intolerable.

The wording was mine and was hasty.  As I've said, it will be corrected in
the final version.  I haven't had a chance to compose new wording yet.

Kent