[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove reference to do in named-let

[John Cowan]

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment at r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan at ccil.org
Issue type: Defect
Priority: Trivial
Component:  Base library
Report version: 5.93
Summary: Remove reference to do in named-let
Report section 9.17 calls named let a "more general looping construct
than do", but do is now banished to the control library.  Substitute
"a general looping construct".


-- 
John Cowan   cowan at ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo