[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing formatting in report section 9.16

[John Cowan]

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment at r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Submitter: John Cowan
Email address: cowan at ccil.org
Issue type: Defect
Priority: Trivial
Component:  Base library
Report version: 5.93
Summary: Confusing formatting in report section 9.16

The second sentence in the description of apply reads:

	*Proc* should accept *n* arguments, where *n* is number of
	*arg*s plus the length of *args*.

The distinction between "*arg*s" and "*args*" is too subtle to
be easily seen.  I suggest replacing "*args*" with "*more-args*"
or the like.  Also, s/is number/is the number/.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan at ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
   There was an old man                Said with a laugh, "I
     From Peru, whose lim'ricks all      Cut them in half, the pay is
       Look'd like haiku.  He              Much better for two."
                                             --Emmet O'Brien