[r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs
Arthur A. Gleckler
arthur at zurich.csail.mit.edu
Fri Jun 8 02:49:08 EDT 2007
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Thomas Lord wrote:
> I am trying to suggest a graceful way to abort the process and
> I'm offering some reasons why that it is a good idea to do so.
I hope that we'll keep the process going just as it is. If R6RS is
not, in fact, ratified, it can still be submitted as an SRFI, or as a
set of SRFIs. But let's let at least give the process a chance.
Many people, most of all the editors, have put a lot of good effort
into R6RS. Even if not everyone agrees with the editors on
everything in the document, we owe them at least the courtesy of
voting for or against ratification.
More information about the r6rs-discuss