[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-specific declarations

[Michael Sperber]

John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Report section 4.5 speaks of "implementation-specific declarations",
> even though declarations have been gone since 5.91.  Some other
> language should be chosen, such as "may provide non-conformant
> implementation modes that do not guarantee safety."

Fixed.  Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla