[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove reference to do in named-let

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Fri Jun 8 05:52:51 EDT 2007


John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Report section 9.17 calls named let a "more general looping construct
> than do", but do is now banished to the control library.  Substitute
> "a general looping construct".

Fixed.  Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list