[r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs

[Jed Davis]

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:59:24PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> Another way to say that:
> 
> Everyone is free to publish a SRFI and everyone is free to ignore any 
> given SRFI.
> 
> Only a particular ad hoc group is free to publish R6 and nobody in the 
> Scheme community is free to ignore R6.
> 
> Therefore, perhaps it is best for the community to have more SRFIs, and 
> no R6.

This presumes that what the Scheme world needs is more freedom.

Given its current fragmented nature, especially as concerns actually
using the language for anything, it appears to need *less* freedom.

-- 
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l))))))  (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k)))))))    '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))