[r6rs-discuss] Minor error in (rnrs records syntactic) examples

Michael Sperber sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Jun 14 03:53:51 EDT 2007


Jed Davis <r6rs at jdev.users.panix.com> writes:

> If someone's already reported this and I somehow missed it, please
> forgive the noise.
>
> In section 6.3 of the libraries report, under "Any definition that takes
> advantage of implicit naming", this example protocol (used thrice):
>
>   (lambda (c) (c (make-widget n)))
>
> seems incorrect; it should, I presume, be:
>
>   (lambda (c) (lambda (n) (c (make-widget n))))

Indeed.  Thanks!

(I might end up rewriting these examples entirely.)

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list