[r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?

[AndrevanTonder]

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Michael Sperber wrote:

> AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> writes:
>
>> [...] a big reason I like your proposal more is that it avoids
>> proliferation of parentheses.
>
> On the other hand, throwing an extra set of parens around the `import'
> and `export' clauses (or making the body of a library also a clause)
> would make the set of possible clauses extensible in future revisions of
> the report in a backward-compatible manner.

True, but that is orthogonal to the issue discussed so far in the thread
(ambiguity and parentheses within the import clause), correct?

Cheers
Andre