June 2007 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Jun 4 06:07:49 EDT 2007
Ending: Sat Jun 30 23:04:17 EDT 2007
Messages: 586

• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Erich Rast
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Brian C. Barnes
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Erich Rast
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Jeff Read
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Erich Rast
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Jeff Read
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Ryan Newton
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Jeff Read
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Nils M Holm
• [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library   Ryan Newton
• [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors Committee   Mitchell Wand
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors Committee   Ludovic Courtès
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal comment #154 resolution not implemented   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal comment #154 resolution not implemented   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal comment #154 resolution not implemented   Jed Davis
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal comment #154 resolution not implemented   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-specific declarations   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-specific declarations   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Report section 6.1 needs reordering   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Report section 6.1 needs reordering   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Defun example should actually implement defun   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Defun example should actually implement defun   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Four binding constructs should be six   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Four binding constructs should be six   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (eqv? 1+2i 3+4i) should be explicitly #f   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (eqv? 1+2i 3+4i) should be explicitly #f   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove reference to do in named-let   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove reference to do in named-let   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in report section 9.13   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in report section 9.13   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing formatting in report section 9.16   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing formatting in report section 9.16   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   Sam TH
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "balues" in Appendix E   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "balues" in Appendix E   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in make-record-constructor-descriptor   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in make-record-constructor-descriptor   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "affect" in library section 8.2.2   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "affect" in library section 8.2.2   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing procedure make-custom-textual-input/output-port   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing procedure make-custom-textual-input/output-port   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "must all belongs" in library section 14   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "must all belongs" in library section 14   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-dependent transcoders considered harmful   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors Committee   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Minor error in (rnrs records syntactic) examples   Jed Davis
  • [r6rs-discuss] Minor error in (rnrs records syntactic) examples   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] to the Steering Committee: from Editors to Observers   Matthias Felleisen
• [r6rs-discuss] Unplugging my formal comments   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Arthur A. Gleckler
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Arthur A. Gleckler
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Jon Wilson
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Jed Davis
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Paulo J. Matos
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Sam TH
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Sam TH
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Chris Hanson
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Chris Hanson
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] R6RS marketing   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] R6RS marketing   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect   Matthias Felleisen
    • [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] John Cowan's remaining formal comments   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect   Matthias Felleisen
    • [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-dependent transcoders considered harmful   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-dependent transcoders considered harmful   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   Jed Davis
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] Version reference ambiguity   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 5.94   James Jackson
  • [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 5.94   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Can we get better specs than this?   Brian C. Barnes
  • [r6rs-discuss] Can we get better specs than this?   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] Multiple versions of a library in a program   Pinku Surana
• [r6rs-discuss] r5.94rs posted   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] and/or error   Jed Davis
  • [r6rs-discuss] and/or error   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] Better diagnostic messages for unmatched parentheses?   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] Better diagnostic messages for unmatched parentheses?   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Better diagnostic messages for unmatched parentheses?   Shiro Kawai
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere   R. Kent Dybvig
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere   Alan Watson
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] `#\newline' should be reinstated   Ludovic Courtès
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] `#\newline' should be reinstated   Brian C. Barnes
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] `#\newline' should be reinstated   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Versioned names for base libraries considered harmful   Ludovic Courtès
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Shiro Kawai
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Erich Rast
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Jed Davis
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Erich Rast
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Jens Axel Søgaard
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Better diagnostic messages for unmatched parentheses?   Matthias Felleisen
• [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   Carl Eastlund
    • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   Sam TH
      • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version   Shiro Kawai
• [r6rs-discuss] Versions should have decimal point   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Versions should have decimal point   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] raise semantics no longer makes sense   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] raise semantics no longer makes sense   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Square brackets idea   Jonathan A Rees
      • [r6rs-discuss] Square brackets idea   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Square brackets idea   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Square brackets idea   Robby Findler
• [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts   Jed Davis
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts   Jed Davis
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] PLT redex typesetting status?   Carl Eastlund
  • [r6rs-discuss] PLT redex typesetting status?   Carl Eastlund
• [r6rs-discuss] (rnrs) composition seems wrong   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] (rnrs) composition seems wrong   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Library Section 11.3 "Exact bitwise arithmetic" should cite SRFI-60.   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Library Section 11.3 "Exact bitwise arithmetic" should cite SRFI-60.   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Eli Barzilay
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] Binary compatibility?   Pascal Costanza
  • [r6rs-discuss] Binary compatibility?   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] Binary compatibility?   Pascal Costanza
• [r6rs-discuss] set! cannot be imported just for RUN   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Erich Rast
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please repair and simplify lexical syntax   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please repair and simplify lexical syntax   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please repair and simplify lexical syntax   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Alan Watson
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Joe Marshall
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Joe Marshall
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Joe Marshall
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
• [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
  • [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors   Bruno Deferrari
    • [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors   Ludovic Courtès
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Sam TH
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Felix Klock
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Sam TH
• [r6rs-discuss] reflecting on compilation   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] reflecting on compilation   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Carl Eastlund
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Sam TH
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Joe Marshall
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Sam TH
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Ludovic Courtès
    • Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   Sam TH
    • [r6rs-discuss] R6RS insanity check (was square brackets etc)   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] R6RS insanity check (was square brackets etc)   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Error in make-assertion-violation   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] division by exact 0   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] division by exact 0   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] division by exact 0   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case   Alan Watson
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be, considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be, considered a number, not a real   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Matthias Felleisen
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Joe Marshall
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Joe Marshall
    • [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] GUI papers [was: compilation and portability]   Trent Buck
• [r6rs-discuss] Sharp questions and things like bytevectors   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
  • [r6rs-discuss] Sharp questions and things like bytevectors   Shiro Kawai
  • [r6rs-discuss] Sharp questions and things like bytevectors   Ludovic Courtès
    • [r6rs-discuss] Sharp questions and things like bytevectors   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
• [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
  • [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets   Anton van Straaten
  • [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets   Ludovic Courtès
    • [r6rs-discuss] division by exact 0   William D Clinger
  • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Onnie Winebarger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Onnie Winebarger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Onnie Winebarger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Carl Eastlund
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Arthur Smyles
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Onnie Winebarger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Eli Barzilay
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Anton van Straaten
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Onnie Winebarger
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Integer division examples should be written in Scheme.   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Eli Barzilay
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Eli Barzilay
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Eli Barzilay
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Alan Watson
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Multiple versions of one library should be linkable   Jed Davis
  • [r6rs-discuss] libraries are parameters (was set-car!)   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] libraries are parameters (was set-car!)   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] all that being said (re libraries)   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] libraries are parameters (was set-car!)   Onnie Winebarger
  • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Anton van Straaten
  • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] How do I version a jpeg?   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] How do I version a jpeg?   Anton van Straaten
  • [r6rs-discuss] How do I version a jpeg?   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Small error in records example   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
  • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Jed Davis
• [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
    • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
    • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] set-car!   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Joe Marshall
      • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] shift toward compilers (was Multiple returns from higher-order procedures)   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Brian C. Barnes
      • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] r5.95rs posted   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Arthur A. Gleckler
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Alan Watson
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Trivial typo   r6rsguy at free-comp-shop.com
  • [r6rs-discuss] Trivial typo   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   R. Kent Dybvig
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] "Treatment of different versions"   Ludovic Courtès
  • [r6rs-discuss] port-position and set-port-position!   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Ludovic Courtès
    • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues   Mikael Tillenius