[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?

[Thomas Lord]

Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
>
> Aubrey, what's this class of "pure interpreters" that you're concerned 
> about?  How do they semantically differ from say petite, csi, gsi, 
> mzscheme, guile, gosh, rscheme, etc?

Doesn't adding the word "semantically" to that question rather miss the 
point?

Did anyone deny that the current R6 draft could be implemented, portably,
atop any R5 implementation, including SCM?

-t