[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?

[Abdulaziz Ghuloum]

On Mar 7, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Thomas Lord wrote:

> While, again, "pure interpreter" is nowhere rigorously defined,
> "interprets source-level s-expressions; plain and simple" suggests
> you have the wrong idea in mind.
>
> A common, directly-interpret-the-s-expressions interpreter
> is an example of a "pure interpreter," sure, but, for example:

Thank you for providing an example of another implementation strategy  
for pure interpreters.

Aziz,,,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/attachments/20070307/4e809fb4/attachment.html