March 2007 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Thu Mar 1 01:41:03 EDT 2007
Ending: Thu Mar 29 08:47:49 EDT 2007
Messages: 486

• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Compound conditions considered bogus   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Compound conditions considered bogus   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Joe Marshall
  • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
  • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   bear
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
      • [r6rs-discuss] Are both put-string and put-string-n necessary?   Ken Friedenbach
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Bradley Lucier
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Sam TH
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor wording issues   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor wording issues   Andre van Tonder
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] ->exact and ->inexact should be renamed   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] ->exact and ->inexact should be renamed   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] ->exact and ->inexact should be renamed   Jens Axel Søgaard
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Bradley Lucier
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Felix Klock
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations (Sam TH)   Bradley Lucier
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations (Sam TH)   Ludovic Courtès
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] comment period ending March 15   R. Kent Dybvig
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] quasiquote freshness   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] quasiquote freshness   AndrevanTonder
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] add list* or cons*   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] add list* or cons*   David Van Horn
• [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Andre van Tonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Andre van Tonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Pascal Costanza
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Pascal Costanza
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Lauri Alanko
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Jon Wilson
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Jon Wilson
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Aubrey Jaffer
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme-6 should be differentiated from earlier versions   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme-6 should be differentiated from earlier versions   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme-6 should be differentiated from earlier versions   Mikael Tillenius
    • [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?   William D Clinger
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] combine syntactic record layers   R. Kent Dybvig
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Robby Findler
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Nathan Thern
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Nathan Thern
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Nathan Thern
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Nathan Thern
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Andre van Tonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Andre van Tonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Andre van Tonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   AndrevanTonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Andre van Tonder
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole   Andre van Tonder
• [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
  • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   bear
    • [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?   Paul Schlie
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   Mikael Tillenius
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   Andre van Tonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records   AndrevanTonder
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   R. Kent Dybvig
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Aubrey Jaffer
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   R. Kent Dybvig
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Lauri Alanko
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations   bear
• [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations   bear
  • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations   bear
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations   bear
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing comparison with Pascal call-by-reference   bear
• [r6rs-discuss] Why are fx+ and fx* restricted to two arguments   bear
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Mikael Tillenius
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarationswith expressions   Chongkai Zhu
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Lauri Alanko
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Per Bothner
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] assorted small fixes and minor suggestions (R5.92RS)   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The name bytevector should be hyphenated.   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eol-style: Explain what the identifier "ls" means.   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eol-style: Explain what the identifier "ls" means.   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eol-style: Explain what the identifier "ls" means.   Arthur A. Gleckler
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library   Martin Gasbichler
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 5.1. Requirement levels is MAXxed out   Aubrey Jaffer
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 5.1. Requirement levels is MAXxed out   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions   Chongkai Zhu
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] the procedural record layer needs better examples   Per Bothner
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Map returning twice   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Map returning twice   Abdulaziz Ghuloum
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Map returning twice   AndrevanTonder
• [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Per Bothner
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Jeff Read
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Per Bothner
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Alexander Kjeldaas
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Alexander Kjeldaas
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
  • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   Michael Sperber
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   David Van Horn
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Robby Findler
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Alexander Kjeldaas
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Mikael Tillenius
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] Extending formal comment period   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] Extending formal comment period   R. Kent Dybvig
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"   Jon Wilson
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"   Per Bothner
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"   Jon Wilson
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Ludovic Courtès
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Per Bothner
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Ludovic Courtès
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement   Michael Sperber
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port   Per Bothner
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port   Michael Sperber
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port   Per Bothner
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   Robby Findler
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   Robby Findler
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove DEFINE and BEGIN^F from formal semantics   AndrevanTonder
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove DEFINE and BEGIN^F from formal semantics   Robby Findler
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove DEFINE and BEGIN^F from formal semantics   AndrevanTonder
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove DEFINE and BEGIN^F from formal semantics   Robby Findler
    • [r6rs-discuss] Comparing Strings   MichaelL at frogware.com
      • [r6rs-discuss] Comparing Strings   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Comparing Strings   Per Bothner
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] right shift formula and bit-field signedness   Daniel Villeneuve
  • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   William D Clinger
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   MichaelL at frogware.com
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Shiro Kawai
    • [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] "Compound conditions considered bogus" withdrawn   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Jeff Read
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The components of a compound condition should be independent   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] interpreters / pragmatics / lisp   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] whatever Scheme is   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jason Orendorff
  • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Per Bothner
    • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jason Orendorff
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jason Orendorff
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Shiro Kawai
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jeff Read
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jason Orendorff
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Michael Sperber
  • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....   Jason Orendorff
• [r6rs-discuss] Recursively immutable objects and shared-nothing primitives?   Alexander Kjeldaas
  • [r6rs-discuss] Recursively immutable objects and shared-nothing primitives?   John Cowan
    • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   William D Clinger
      • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel   Robby Findler
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] NaNs are not real numbers   Aubrey Jaffer
• [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Jason Orendorff
  • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   Thomas Lord
  • [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Jason Orendorff
  • [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations   Thomas Lord
• [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful   John Cowan
• [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   John Cowan
  • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord
    • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   John Cowan
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Per Bothner
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Per Bothner
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Per Bothner
      • [r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)   Thomas Lord