[r6rs-discuss] Shouldn't it be (rrs)?

[Abdulaziz Ghuloum]

On May 24, 2007, at 10:01 AM, AndrevanTonder wrote:

> In any case, shouldn't it be
>
>    (rrs)
>    (rrs (6))
>    (rrs base)
>
> and so on?  The current (rnrs (6)) sounds, to me, like
>
>    "The sixth version of the n-th report",
>
> which is a bit nonsensical.

If you think (rnrs (6)) sounds nonsensical, try reading
(rnrs r5rs (6)).

Aziz,,,