[r6rs-discuss] R6 counterproposal

[Sam TH]

On 5/25/07, Jay Sulzberger <jays at panix.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2007, Thomas Lord <lord at emf.net> wrote:
>
> > R6 should be completely different from the current draft,
> > in my opinion.
> >
> > The addition of a few, parsimoniously chosen features
> > eliminates the need for almost everything that is new
> > in the R6 draft.   Nearly *ALL* of the new hacks could
> > be done as SRFIs, if only R6 would add these few OPTIONAL
> > features:
>
> Yes.  Let us keep Scheme Scheme.

In which version of the Scheme report did first class environments
appear?  Fexprs?

-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu