[r6rs-discuss] string-fill!

[Michael Sperber]

Sven.Hartrumpf at FernUni-Hagen.de writes:

> I would like to see string-fill! extended like in SRFI 13, i.e.
> optional start and end arguments.

Given that R5.93RS effectively gives `string-fill!' (along with
`string-set!') second-class status, with many of us hoping it will go
away entirely in some future report, I personally think this isn't
worthwhile.

> Small proofreading comments:
> - Heading of A.9 contains an "&" (instead of "and"), and this is the only place in the standard.
>
> - Language names in 1.: should be ordered to avoid any unwanted implications.
>
> - Similarly, for programming paradigms: the order "imperative, functional, and message passing"
>   seems to emphasize "imperative".

Good suggestions, all.  Will do.  Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla