sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Sun May 27 03:53:08 EDT 2007
Sven.Hartrumpf at FernUni-Hagen.de writes:
> I would like to see string-fill! extended like in SRFI 13, i.e.
> optional start and end arguments.
Given that R5.93RS effectively gives `string-fill!' (along with
`string-set!') second-class status, with many of us hoping it will go
away entirely in some future report, I personally think this isn't
> Small proofreading comments:
> - Heading of A.9 contains an "&" (instead of "and"), and this is the only place in the standard.
> - Language names in 1.: should be ordered to avoid any unwanted implications.
> - Similarly, for programming paradigms: the order "imperative, functional, and message passing"
> seems to emphasize "imperative".
Good suggestions, all. Will do. Thanks!
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the r6rs-discuss