[r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double

[Michael Sperber]

Alan Watson <alan at alan-watson.org> writes:

> In their response to formal comment 122, the editors indicated that they 
> were going to remove real->single and real->double, but these still 
> appear in the latest draft. Is this just an oversight?

Yes.  Thanks for noticing!

> I personally would be happy for them to continue to be part of the standard.

I'm afraid, at least for now, that's been decided: They'll go in the
next draft.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla