[r6rs-discuss] string->utfX and utfX-string questions

[John Cowan]

Michael Sperber scripsit:

> If this change were made, should the endianness even be optional?  I.e.
> 
> (utf16->string b (endianness big) #f)
> 
> would be equivalent to what's currently
> 
> (utf16->string b)
> 
> Right?

Correct.  I'm not very happy with boolean arguments: it's easy to
forget which sense means what, but that's a detail.

-- 
In politics, obedience and support      John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
are the same thing.  --Hannah Arendt    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan