[r6rs-discuss] string->utfX and utfX-string questions
cowan at ccil.org
Sun May 27 21:46:48 EDT 2007
Michael Sperber scripsit:
> If this change were made, should the endianness even be optional? I.e.
> (utf16->string b (endianness big) #f)
> would be equivalent to what's currently
> (utf16->string b)
Correct. I'm not very happy with boolean arguments: it's easy to
forget which sense means what, but that's a detail.
In politics, obedience and support John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
More information about the r6rs-discuss