[r6rs-discuss] peculiar semantics for a predicate
William D Clinger
will at ccs.neu.edu
Thu Nov 1 12:15:24 EDT 2007
> >I doubt whether this was the intended semantics, but
> >those of us who take R6RS conformance seriously will
> >implement it faithfully.
> That is ... sad. I would not choose to make a dialect
> *less* useful, in an obvious way, in order to conform
> to what is clearly an error in the standard.
Not to worry, Bear. So far as I can tell, no one is taking
R6RS conformance seriously.
I certainly don't. On Larceny's main wiki page concerning
conformance, the very first of the bullet items that list
sources of non-conformance says "Larceny does not conform
to known errors in the R6RS." 
More information about the r6rs-discuss