[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS

[Elf]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Thomas Lord wrote:

> Elf wrote:
>> 
>> how are we defining 'most actively maintained' and 'serious'?  most srfi's?
>> largest user bases?  most frequent version-control checkins?  largest 
>> support
>> library set?  most uptake outside the scheme community?
>
> How about best funding?
>
> -t
>
>

funding in terms of 'programmer time' or 'suckers money' ? :)


-elf