[r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Sun Oct 28 20:52:18 EDT 2007
Elf scripsit:
> however, all older implementations that i am aware of support r4rs.
That's because the sole surviving R3RS implementation, T, has been
in hibernation for lo these many years (and compatibility was never
guaranteed for T anyhow).
--
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion
that optimum or inadequate performance in the trend of competitive
activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity,
but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be
taken into account. --Ecclesiastes 9:11, Orwell/Brown version
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list