[r6rs-discuss] Lexical syntax: unicode category "Co"

[Michael Sperber]

Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu> writes:

> Is that "Co" a typo for something else?  Or should it just be removed?

No, it's intentional.  Co character are meant for the private use of
*applications*---they're not unassigned, which is something different.
That's why Scheme implementations should treat them generically and
allow them in <constituent>.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla