[r6rs-discuss] Lexical syntax: unicode category "Co"
sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Sat Sep 22 11:06:01 EDT 2007
Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum at cs.indiana.edu> writes:
> Is that "Co" a typo for something else? Or should it just be removed?
No, it's intentional. Co character are meant for the private use of
*applications*---they're not unassigned, which is something different.
That's why Scheme implementations should treat them generically and
allow them in <constituent>.
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
More information about the r6rs-discuss