[r6rs-discuss] thinko in spec of fxcopy-bit-field
William D Clinger
will at ccs.neu.edu
Thu Sep 27 17:06:50 EDT 2007
Why, pray tell, must the third argument to fxcopy-bit-field
be less than (fixnum-width)?
I understand that the implementation in the 5.97 draft would
raise an exception without that restriction, but all that
proves is that the weaknesses and restrictions of the 5.97
draft make it unnecessarily difficult to program in this
new language we call Scheme.
More information about the r6rs-discuss