[r6rs-discuss] Was exporting records ever discussed?

[R. Kent Dybvig]

> As far as I can tell, with R6RS we have to keep up tradition (in
> several Schemes) of explicitly exporting every
> accessor/mutator/predicate/constructor for a (syntactic) record type
> definition.  If this issue was discussed, I'd be interested to read
> that discussion.

There wasn't much discussion.  Here are a couple of messages that mention
a co-export form I proposed to address this:

  http://www.r6rs.org/r6rs-editors/2005-July/000752.html
  http://www.r6rs.org/r6rs-editors/2005-July/000755.html

The co-export form also showed up in the "Issues" section of SRFI 83: 
http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-83/srfi-83.html

Kent