[r6rs-discuss] @ should be a valid identifier
cowan at ccil.org
Fri Jul 4 01:01:56 EDT 2008
Neil Jerram scripsit:
> And yet... R5RS systems, using SXML, have somehow managed to live with
> this ambiguity. Did R6RS need to choose what appears to be a
> relatively extreme method of resolving it?
R5RS has exactly the same constraint, and to the extent that actual Scheme
systems allow @ initially in an identifier, they don't conform to R5RS.
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan
Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo:
"Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!"
El Auruns's reply: "Many happy returns of the day!"
More information about the r6rs-discuss