per at bothner.com
Thu Jul 17 11:32:19 EDT 2008
Michael Sperber wrote:
> Per Bothner <per at bothner.com> writes:
>> (1) I assume "fixnum" is an error.
>> (2) Rather than "corresponding bits in ei4", which is ambiguous since
>> it could also mean "the bits in ei4 at positions from ei2 (inclusive)
>> to ei3 (exclusive)" I suggest "the low-order (- ei3 ei2) bits of ei4".
> Yes - this was already on the errata list on:
Indeed, sorry. I checked the errata before reporting bitwise-copy-bit,
and then "got on a roll" so I forgot to re-check until it was too late
before reporting the bitwise-copy-bit-field problems.
per at bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
More information about the r6rs-discuss