[r6rs-discuss] gcd & lcm argument requirements
eli at barzilay.org
Sun Mar 23 21:28:11 EDT 2008
On Mar 23, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Mar 23, Llewellyn Pritchard wrote:
> > Hi
> > It appears what valid arguments are for gcd and lcm are undefined. Should
> > rationals be allowed or is this behavior unspecified?
> > Most Scheme's (R6RS and otherwise) seems to choke on the following:
> > (lcm 12/5 6 4)
> > and
> > (gcd 12/5 6 4)
> > If indeed that should be allowed, can the behaviour be described? (I get 12
> > and 2/5 respectively).
> The PLT docs for these indicate integers:
(Apologies for the PLT-specific reply, I completely missed the fact
that it was sent on the r6rs list. I should be ticketed for PUF
(posting under the fever).)
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
More information about the r6rs-discuss