[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Sat Oct 18 21:56:01 EDT 2008


Derick Eddington scripsit:

> Why does R6RS specify that predicates like =, <, >=, char<?, fx>=?, etc.
> accept a minimum of two arguments instead of accepting zero or more?

What would be the "obvious" value of (< 2) or (=)?  I have no idea whether
#t or #f would win here.

-- 
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           cowan at ccil.org



More information about the r6rs-discuss mailing list