[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Sat Oct 18 21:56:01 EDT 2008
Derick Eddington scripsit:
> Why does R6RS specify that predicates like =, <, >=, char<?, fx>=?, etc.
> accept a minimum of two arguments instead of accepting zero or more?
What would be the "obvious" value of (< 2) or (=)? I have no idea whether
#t or #f would win here.
--
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan
is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) cowan at ccil.org
More information about the r6rs-discuss
mailing list