[r6rs-discuss] Comparison procedures' number of arguments

[Abdulaziz Ghuloum]

On Oct 19, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Jon Wilson wrote:

> On the other hand, take a decreasing sequence
> (< 4 3 2 1)
> (< 3 2 1)
> (< 3 2)
> (< 2)
> (<)
> all => #f?
> Is it less silly if, for example, whether a sequence is increasing  
> could
> be changed from #f to #t by removing the last element?

That's not silly at all.

Take (< 1 2 3 4 5 -1000) which is #f, remove the last element, and  
you get #t.

Aziz,,,